5/8/2023 0 Comments Call of dodo![]() ![]() In addition to concision and spontaneity, Olson thinks scientists could also benefit from injecting some humor into their talks and learning to be a little more humble when dealing with people who don't agree with their views. It's all very lively and fun and unpredictable." A few of the scientists are trying to explain things, and they're being cut off and interrupted and criticized. "It's not scripted and doesn't have the standard talking heads," Olson explains. "I do not believe in any way, shape or form we descended from apes," says another.įinally, one young man says, "I didn't believe that until I met my uncle who has more back hair than I have facial hair."Īudiences have responded particularly well to scenes in his film where Olson's evolutionist friends are playing poker. "I do not believe that we descended from apes," says one college student in the film. One such misconception, repeated again and again in the film, is that humans are not descended from apes, as the fossil record shows we are. The film makes clear that if scientists can't explain evolution in a way the public can understand, misconceptions that threaten the credibility of the theory, and which creationists can exploit, will persist. The dummy takes 12 pages to explain what everybody needs to know, while the great communicator does it in a page and a half." "It's like in mathematics when dummies present the proof of a formula in a hundred steps and the genius does the same thing in five," Olson said. To start, Olson thinks scientists should practice being concise and punchier, as opposed to long-winded and exhaustingly thorough, when talking about their work. But it's not too late to change, he says. ![]() Olson fears the elitism he sees among his colleagues could turn the public off to science. During interviews, evolutionists appear stiff, condescending, inarticulate and arrogant. "These guys have this really deep-seated intuition that they can look at nature and see a designer at work, but the problem is they've failed to advance it to any kind of science so far."ĭespite Olson's dismissal of intelligent design in his film, scientists come off looking even worse. "There isn't much to intelligent design," Olson told LiveScience. As a marine ecologist with more than 20 years of research experience, Olson ultimately sides with evolution and concludes that intelligent design is at best an idea stalled at the intuition stage. He provides a running commentary of the issues discussed and even weighs in on the debate. Olson himself is also a central character in the film. Evolutionists play poker, and there's a lesson on the unintelligent design of rabbits, that have to eat their own poop to get nutrients from their food. The 90-minute film also features Olson's mother, Muffy "Moose" Olson, as well as a flock of animated dodos running around doing nothing. The film features interviews with both Harvard evolutionists and ID advocates, including Michael Behe, a central figure in the movement. "Flock of Dodos" is a humorous examination of the debate between evolutionists and intelligent design (ID) proponents who argue that life is too complex to be explained by science alone. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |